Kinds of videogame
Dec. 27th, 2018 11:54 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
mtbcMany years ago I played a wide range of computer games. Back in the 1980s the graphics were rudimentary but I don't think that matters. For example, considering the wire-frame graphics of vehicle simulators like Battlezone or Elite, I suppose that one's mind imbues the abstractions with significance just as when one reads a novel, so I found them immersive. After a decade of gameplaying I chose to have other activities displace it: athough I saw first-person shooters like Doom or Descent over others' shoulders, I have not played them: I know subsequent games like Half-Life and Halo only through popular culture.
Ignoring multiplayer games like Scorched Earth, games that held my attention better include various novel elements as one progresses: even basic early games like Chuckie Egg or Bruce Lee added new layouts with hazards like the duck coming free. In more recent years it looked to me as if games like Ōkami offer variety. Personally, it was flight simulators such as Gunship and F29 Retaliator that I most enjoyed. They didn't have to be combat simulators: it was through Solo Flight that I first discovered how flat Kansas is.
I notice that others seem to favor games that I would expect to bore me. These puzzle games that people play on their smartphones, matching rows of jewels and the like, look tedious but I never much liked Tetris either. Or, considering consoles, watching people play games like Super Smash Bros. has me curious about their appeal: as an observer it all looks so similar and I find my attention wandering. On talking to players I hear that the different characters favor different playing styles so I suppose that there must be richness that goes unperceived by me as a bystander to the fights. Were I to try such a fighting game I may turn out to like it but my armchair suspicion is that I would still prefer flight simulators. If different people do look for different things in videogames then I wonder why that is.
Ignoring multiplayer games like Scorched Earth, games that held my attention better include various novel elements as one progresses: even basic early games like Chuckie Egg or Bruce Lee added new layouts with hazards like the duck coming free. In more recent years it looked to me as if games like Ōkami offer variety. Personally, it was flight simulators such as Gunship and F29 Retaliator that I most enjoyed. They didn't have to be combat simulators: it was through Solo Flight that I first discovered how flat Kansas is.
I notice that others seem to favor games that I would expect to bore me. These puzzle games that people play on their smartphones, matching rows of jewels and the like, look tedious but I never much liked Tetris either. Or, considering consoles, watching people play games like Super Smash Bros. has me curious about their appeal: as an observer it all looks so similar and I find my attention wandering. On talking to players I hear that the different characters favor different playing styles so I suppose that there must be richness that goes unperceived by me as a bystander to the fights. Were I to try such a fighting game I may turn out to like it but my armchair suspicion is that I would still prefer flight simulators. If different people do look for different things in videogames then I wonder why that is.
no subject
Date: 2019-01-19 04:32 pm (UTC)I looked through the websites of the local boxing gyms and found this one: http://www.gladdenboxingclub.com/
At the time I was looking, he had a statement about his philosophy of boxing. It appealed to me, so I went to meet him and signed up!