The US election certainly deserves comment: things went about as well as I had dared hope. Especially, with enough margin in the Senate that the Fettermans and such of this world don't get to hold us hostage like Manchin/Sinema. I enjoyed reading the comment,
We can be busy investigating enablers and minions but the Democratic Party would do well to plan for 2028 understanding what actually happened. Voters might like Democratic policies but Republican sophistry has been so effective that the Democratic Party and its candidates aren't enough linked with those positions. This time around, it's not as if left-wing ideology was persuasive: the principal driver was that people voted against the incumbents because the cost of living grew higher. Democratic messaging must be framed with that in mind.
Further, progressive wins in northern states do not mean such candidates can win enough electoral votes further south even given a leftward shift. Few candidates can match Obama's oratory. The Democratic Party can't have socially liberal litmus tests for candidates if they also want to win: the window of discourse has inertia. In particular, I'd love to see more Democratic candidates in the Bible Belt owning Christianity: putting a Scriptural basis behind a message of humbly helping (including financially) absolutely everybody who needs it, correctly painting a lot of Republican rhetoric as clearly contrary to Jesus' recorded words.
When they arrest Stephen Miller, they should bring a net so he can’t escape by transforming into a cloud of bats.Well, welcome to the new Chief of Staff pulling Trump's strings.
We can be busy investigating enablers and minions but the Democratic Party would do well to plan for 2028 understanding what actually happened. Voters might like Democratic policies but Republican sophistry has been so effective that the Democratic Party and its candidates aren't enough linked with those positions. This time around, it's not as if left-wing ideology was persuasive: the principal driver was that people voted against the incumbents because the cost of living grew higher. Democratic messaging must be framed with that in mind.
Further, progressive wins in northern states do not mean such candidates can win enough electoral votes further south even given a leftward shift. Few candidates can match Obama's oratory. The Democratic Party can't have socially liberal litmus tests for candidates if they also want to win: the window of discourse has inertia. In particular, I'd love to see more Democratic candidates in the Bible Belt owning Christianity: putting a Scriptural basis behind a message of humbly helping (including financially) absolutely everybody who needs it, correctly painting a lot of Republican rhetoric as clearly contrary to Jesus' recorded words.