Pandemic advice from the WHO
Jul. 5th, 2020 08:53 amI had previously had a vaguely good impression of the World Health Organization. However, during this pandemic they have unpleasantly surprised me. In trying to understand how to protect myself from SARS-CoV-2 I have been keeping somewhat abreast of the preliminary research and it did not take long for multiple credible items of circumstantial evidence to emerge that widespread mask-wearing helps and that infection appears to follow indoor airflow. I would certainly understand some
we're not surecaveats but it disappointed me to see how long it took the WHO to start to agree about masks and now they seem to be dragging their feet on airborne transmission. As somebody who dropped biology before finishing high school and whose professional focus is neither medical nor epidemiological, am I the one very plausibly mistaken about all this, should I have more faith? Otherwise, what is going on with the WHO? Are they hamstrung by what would be politically convenient for China and the US? Are they scared to make a best guess in a crisis situation? Should we be listening to some other organization instead?
no subject
Date: 2020-07-06 02:35 pm (UTC)So, I was looking at it a lot more closely than other people were. Plus I have a fascination with viruses going back to the 1990s. And, the back and forth between NY and the CDC was entertaining.
NY1 had a bet going on when the CDC would let NY test. Each day they'd report on it - with the Mayor announcing that no, CDC hadn't granted permission yet, but not to worry - they were hunting ways to do it without them. LOL!
Then when the Governor started doing his briefings? He would make snide remarks about the CDC and WHO and the Feds. It was subtle at first, when he needed their help. It's not subtle now. He's reminded the NY Times several times now in his briefings that the CDC wouldn't let them test and told them they were being silly.