Series of science fiction novels
Mar. 2nd, 2019 07:46 amA fortnight ago I mentioned reading the Strugatskys'
These days a high fraction of acclaimed science fiction novels appear to be fat volumes. That is okay: it gives me a good few hours' reading. However, they are also either obviously part of a larger series (
What happened? Did we reduce the tax on words or fire all the editors? Am I looking at the wrong publishers? I don't mind sequels per se, nor do I mind reuse of built worlds: e.g., Banks'
Much as I liked, say, Egan's
Roadside Picnic. Not only is it a good piece of science fiction but it is also a slender volume, my library's copy coming in at under 150 pages. It has been some time since I read, say, Matheson's
I Am Legendbut I doubt that's much larger. Decent fiction need not be lengthy. It is not as if even Orwell's
1984is all that fat a book.
These days a high fraction of acclaimed science fiction novels appear to be fat volumes. That is okay: it gives me a good few hours' reading. However, they are also either obviously part of a larger series (
cycleor whatever) or less obviously so: I should learn to be less surprised when they reference events I don't know then end inconclusively. I am all for having plenty to read but if I am new to the author then I am not about to invest quite that much time in them to get a complete story, especially when so many are mediocre.
What happened? Did we reduce the tax on words or fire all the editors? Am I looking at the wrong publishers? I don't mind sequels per se, nor do I mind reuse of built worlds: e.g., Banks'
Use of Weaponsis not his first Culture novel but hardly benefits from one having read others. Or I don't mind when one can stop early without missing much, probably occurring when it was not yet clear there would be a sequel, except that is not easy to tell at a glance.
Much as I liked, say, Egan's
AxiomaticI need not restrict myself to short stories. I would simply like to find the section of the library that offers us science fiction novels that do not expect us to read a set of related books; I fear that they would not need much space to house that subset. In the meantime I find myself looking out for reprints of classics that I missed the first time around, back when authors could still fit a story into one book.
no subject
Date: 2019-03-02 08:36 pm (UTC)Re-using characters and setting has obvious benefits for both author and reader. Deliberately telling a multi-book story has the standard "see what happens next" serialization benefit.
Bujold is an excellent SF author who's like Pratchett in writing standalone novels that re-use characters.