Oct. 23rd, 2016

mtbc: maze J (red-white)
In September 2014 I weighed over 230lb when I started to swim and fast. After a year of that I weighed under 210lb but it seemed to be plateauing there. At the end of last February I still weighed 205lb so I started to also restrict my calories to their present level of 12,500 per week. For many of the weeks that I was actually on my diet (rather than some kind of vacation or trip intervening) I lost over 1½lb per week and now weigh under 170lb. However, in recent weeks I am down to losing ¾lb per week. That is still a good rate and perhaps simply reflects that the less fat mass I have, the less easily more is lost. I have also lost over six inches around my waist which is reassuring regarding the threat of visceral fat stressing my organs.

In August 2011 The Lancet published a series on obesity that included Quantification of the effect of energy imbalance on bodyweight from the National Institutes of Health: to paraphrase a little,
Every change of energy intake of 10 kcal per day will lead to an eventual bodyweight change of about 1 pound with half of the weight change being achieved in about 1 year and 95% of the weight change in about 3 years.
The above confirms that for constant calorie intake one should expect diminishing weight loss over time. Further, the numbers suggest that, given that I have probably done little over six months' proper dieting, mixed with vacations and similar, I will be able to increase my calorie intake some way without starting to gain weight.

I try to weigh myself approximately monthly: I think that allows sufficient monitoring of progress without the data being dwarfed by irrelevant noise.
mtbc: maze I (white-red)
Firefox 49 has removed the browser.urlbar.unifiedcomplete configuration property which was but the latest that allowed me to undo another user interface change that I really didn't like; messing with userChrome.css and similar just seems ridiculous. Chrome follows the same pattern of making the user interface increasingly minimal and symbol-centric, decreasingly configurable, with the underlying application becoming increasingly featureful in doing things I don't want (even auto-upgrading addons), making it a real hassle to use sites with poorly configured SSL certificates, etc. I can't help but wonder if browser design didn't peak sometime around when Mosaic gained proper support for the table element. I have used Firefox for a long time but, as with Amazon, almost every obvious change for some years now has for me been a regression in usability.

On the other hand, if I use the wrong browser then I can expect many websites to not work properly. Not using Internet Explorer (or Edge or whatever it now is) probably already causes some trouble and I overhear enough conversations where Mac users find that some website doesn't work and the underlying cause appears to be their optimistic use of Safari. I wonder if there are any browsers that remain configurable and largely limit their feature development to actually showing me webpages and otherwise staying out of my way. Perhaps I should check how Pale Moon's coming along.

Profile

mtbc: photograph of me (Default)
Mark T. B. Carroll

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 12 3456
78910111213
14 15161718 19 20
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 30th, 2025 03:26 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios