Jun. 5th, 2016

mtbc: maze I (white-red)
When I realize that I need to restore files from backup it tends to be either quite soon after they were deleted or a long time afterward. So, in organizing backups, I tend to adopt a somewhat logarithmic spacing: I may have a few backups from the past couple of months but also some even from past years. While I back up regularly they overwrite old backups so as to appromixately maintain such spacing.

I recently learned that my approach may be unusual. For instance, my impression is that one important set of backups at work goes no further back than three months. For me, the approach of equally spaced backups cycling through the available capacity is decidedly suboptimal: I want the resulting progression to look rather more geometric than arithmetic even if that means fewer backups in total from retaining some larger increments.

One hopes that this question has actually been studied and modeled properly based on the modification time of files that users need retrieving from backups. If so, I wonder what the findings were.

Profile

mtbc: photograph of me (Default)
Mark T. B. Carroll

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
456789 10
11121314151617
18 192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 19th, 2026 08:46 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios