mtbc: maze K (white-green)
Mark T. B. Carroll ([personal profile] mtbc) wrote2016-01-24 03:28 pm
Entry tags:

Children's movies: animated ones are best?

I was thinking about the children's movies that I think are actually rather good: ones that bear rewatching and are worth keeping on DVD. Those that come to my mind, such as Coraline (2009), Kiki's Delivery Service (1989) and Wall-E (2008), are all animated. When I try to think of live-action movies I've seen since having children myself I come up a bit short in terms of ones to which I'd actually be happy to pay full attention again: I can't off-hand think of anything much better than the Harry Potter movies which are okay but hardly special and entrancing. Perhaps this says more about me than it does children, but I am struck by how the children's movies I like the most are all animated.
damerell: (anime)

[personal profile] damerell 2016-01-24 04:42 pm (UTC)(link)
JOOI, how many are Studio Ghibli?
gerald_duck: (mallard)

[personal profile] gerald_duck 2016-01-24 10:39 pm (UTC)(link)
A friend made an astute observation about South Park, the other year. It's a cartoon for adults. The themes are adults. It's utterly inappropriate for children. A lot of the controversy seems to stem from people making the mistake of assuming that a cartoon with children in it is a children's cartoon.

So: child characters does not imply children's movie. Does the absence of child characters imply it's not a children's movie?

Which brings me to my main question: what's the difference between a movie for children that adults also enjoy, and a movie for all ages? Star Wars, for example, is U-rated in the UK.
mindstalk: (Default)

[personal profile] mindstalk 2016-01-28 06:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Hmm. The movies I've seen with Friendkids, and what they get from their grandparents, are pretty much all animated too, for a wide variety of 'animation'.