Entry tags:
Dedicated server choices
I am finally getting back around to the migration effort to unmanaged dedicated servers. However, a feature I much appreciate is always-on KVM / VNC / whatever access to the console as I do not want to have to boot from a rescue image and try to work with an operating system that is effectively on different hardware thanks to QEMU. So far I have found that reliable console access comes with only the more expensive server offerings, doubly unfortunate given that I also try to keep a second server for redundancy. I do not intend to spend nearly a hundred pounds per month for plenty of CPU and disk that I do not need; I doubt that I could recoup much of that cost through Gridcoin or similar. So, I shall sleep on the question.
no subject
Given the low probability of it becoming unbootable, it doesn't seem worth paying a lot. Would a little downtime really be a big problem in the worst case scenerio?
no subject
Generally providers offer through their web admin panel the opportunity to boot from a rescue image which can suffice if one can then mount the regular filesystems and detect from logs and config files and whatnot what the problem actually is, but for my issue on Friday the logs hadn't been touched and the config looked fine to me. It could have helped enormously to be able to see what was going on on the console during the failed reboot. So, without console access my downtime can end up being days instead of minutes.