mtbc: photograph of me (Default)
[personal profile] mtbc
Money is well-known to have a non-linear utility function. For example, from my position I would gladly trade a ⅓ chance of winning $20m for a ⅔ chance of winning $5m. What I have not thought through clearly is the effect on lottery tickets: can it make sense to buy only one ticket or, if it is worth buying any at all, is it likely that buying a few would make even more sense?

On the one hand, if running a lottery is profitable and the utility of money decreases the more I win then that might argue for never buying lottery tickets: the ticket cost is worth too much to me. But, the procedure by which unwon jackpots commonly roll over might make ticket-buying make sense at least for linear utility if the number of tickets purchased does not increase proportionally to the larger jackpot. Can rollovers ever make it rational to buy a bunch of tickets? Perhaps the non-linearity is always enough to scotch even that idea.

Date: 2017-06-24 03:16 pm (UTC)
aldabra: (Default)
From: [personal profile] aldabra
I did this sum once. If I saved a pound a week, I would be able to buy a house in Cambridge in, I think, 4,000 years. If I bought a lottery ticket a week I would have a non-zero chance of being able to buy a house while I'm still alive.

It's not obvious that the decreasing marginal utility of money is the only game in town, here.

Profile

mtbc: photograph of me (Default)
Mark T. B. Carroll

July 2017

S M T W T F S
       1
234 5678
910 11 12 13 1415
161718 19202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 20th, 2017 04:33 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios